Forum
Advisor Blog
Reviews
Strategies
Ideas
It makes no sense to have 1500 tables because you start out with 1500. This encourages players who lose their first game to just make a new account. You should have 1600, 1800, and 2000 tables.
|
Szczeepan wrote
at 11:17 PM, Friday December 22, 2006 EST |
19 people think this is a good idea
Replies 1 - 6 of 6
|
tweek1 wrote
at 11:55 AM, Saturday December 23, 2006 EST Thats true. I thought i was the only one that realized it. It really dont make any sense.
|
|
Bobbo wrote
at 4:12 PM, Saturday December 23, 2006 EST If we're having the 1600, 1800 and others, add 1400 one too so that they don't start on a 0.
|
|
|
Bobbo wrote
at 11:10 PM, Monday December 25, 2006 EST I'm agreeing to this now, regardless, because I feel 300 is too much of a separation between tables. Once you get to about 1700, a win is only about 30-40 points and a loss is 60-70 points.
Also, with the less experienced players, it becomes more random. When somebody has ten territories with about twelve dice, it's frustrating when you don't border and the people with a shot do nothing. |
|
llam wrote
at 3:41 PM, Monday January 1, 2007 EST It could even change to just 1501.
|
|
Teej wrote
at 9:37 PM, Friday February 23, 2007 EST I would go for 0-1400-1700-2000.
|
|
|
Szczeepan wrote
at 10:34 AM, Monday April 30, 2007 EDT it be good when we have this:
1500+ 1600+ 1700+ 1800+ 1900+ 2000+ 2100+ and make less tables then now (its 4 tables 1900, make 2 tables 1800, 1900, 2000,2100) |
