Forum
Advisor Blog
Reviews
Strategies
Ideas
truces...1700+
|
sarahxxx wrote
at 7:21 AM, Saturday April 14, 2007 EDT
i was recently in a game where blue was in first and yellow second...all 7 players left in
blue was gona win and if anyone was gona stop him it was yellow, in stead yellow persisted in wasting dice TRYING to kill me although i was flagged and lying idle. i pointed that fact to yellow and he replied "i'd rather truce with blue" blue accepted and wiped the floor with everyone... now, i understand the point of this game is to win, make truces to ensure 1st/2nd etc, but on a 1700+ table...? i thought players that have reached 1700+ status are skilled and have respect for the other players and the ettequette of the game. why a 1st/2nd truce, isn't that bad ettequette? i know there are no rules etc, im simply saying this as i am interested in your views... |
|
Grunvagr wrote
at 11:35 AM, Saturday April 14, 2007 EDT Kdice etiquette is not codified law chiseled in stone. People still act however they want to, ultimately.
I've seen 1/2 truces at the 1900 tables too. There is no point one can reach in rating where everyone agrees to stop such lame tactics. btw, take off that ugly hat, ya got pretty hair so dont hide it |
|
Zalethon wrote
at 5:08 PM, Saturday April 14, 2007 EDT I don't see exactly how this is 'lame'? It seems like a decent strategy, which works.. I understand the point about it being a multi player game, but in playing such a game, and a war game at that, you should be prepared to lose.. And not expect everyone to treat you in a way that you find fair..
P.S. I like the hat. |
|
StunnedFazer wrote
at 5:22 PM, Saturday April 14, 2007 EDT "i thought players that have reached 1700+ status are skilled and have respect for the other players and the ettequette of the game."
That made me laff. P.S. ditch the hat |
|
Evermore wrote
at 6:35 PM, Saturday April 14, 2007 EDT i quite like that hat.
|
|
RaccoonTail wrote
at 8:50 PM, Saturday April 14, 2007 EDT No hat. let them eyes shine babe!
|
|
Intangelon wrote
at 10:51 AM, Sunday April 15, 2007 EDT Love the hat.
I would ask the Forum what flagging really means, with regard to gameplay. |
|
kwizatz wrote
at 1:02 PM, Sunday April 15, 2007 EDT If 1/2 truce wouldn't change the outcome of the game I don't care. (e.g. 1 is very big, 2 is kinda big, everyone else is weenies)
If I'm 1st and 2 and 3 are close in size to me and 2 wants to truce me, I'm gonna go for it, otherwise 2 and 3 will truce and tear me up. If I'm 2nd and 1st wants to truce me I probably won't go for it depending on the lameness of the situation. And the hat sucks. |
|
PhilDeez wrote
at 1:25 PM, Sunday April 15, 2007 EDT keep the hat. Lose the shirt.
|
|
|
RaccoonTail wrote
at 1:33 PM, Sunday April 15, 2007 EDT The flag is a subtle, difficult to master and highly controversial weapon, but in the hands of a wise player it can be quite powerful. One thing it certainly does NOT mean, however, is, "I surrender now and will absolutely not attack anyone anymore." despite how much some people wish it did.
|
|
JKD wrote
at 1:38 PM, Sunday April 15, 2007 EDT So you say no to buddy in 1st, he kills you next while some weakling(s) that didn't war place higher than you?
Or maybe you ally with player in 3rd and finish 1-2 because it would be lame for the leader to get 1st? |
